Political Post, late July, 2019
While listening to NPR this
morning I heard an interview with an Englishman talking about Brexit. He wants to proceed, get on with it, and he
mentioned the “nanny state”. I immediately
thought about myself and my state of retirement, wondering if I am doing
enough, or anything, to contribute or at this point am I just basking, taking
in the fruits of my many lucky breaks.
This seems to relate to my writing, which I struggle with constantly,
not really knowing if I can do it. This
is what I do as I exist in my self-contained vessel of negative
self-regard. Whatever the topic (medical
practice, bicycling, volunteering at the shop, owning an airstream, writing,
reading…come to think of it, EVERYTHING!), I consider as activities that I do
inferiorly. So just now, I am thinking
that this has got to be false, because that just cannot be true. So I’m calling bullshit on myself, and just
now plan to continue writing.
Yesterday, I re-read an article
in the New York Times magazine by Michael Steinberger, a regular writer for the
magazine who last wrote about George Soros.
In the current piece on the presidential campaign, he references the much-discussed controversy about what
strategy democrats should embrace to win the presidency. Should our goal be winning over moderates who
could conceivably vote for either Trump or the democrat, or should the goal be
energizing and mobilizing our diverse and generally left of center base with
bold progressive policy platforms. I am
an advocate for evolving the state into much more of a force for justice, which
would include a very serious consideration and likely implementation of a Universal Basic
Income, access to essential health care services for all persons without a
financial penalty, and significant specific help for those who are wealth-deficient
due to historical catastrophes of prejudicial policy that has resulted
in passive, persistent structural inequality.
So with that, I would love to
vote for someone like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Beto O’Roarke, Julian
Castro, Marianne Williamson, for Christ’s sake.
But maybe, just maybe, those huge cohorts of low-turnout voters that
would benefit from policies such as these would continue to vote in low
percentages. And faced with a threat of
“impending communism” and the end of life as they know it, the other side would
mobilize aggressively as they have been known to do, win another 4 years, and
perhaps convert the country into something equally radical, and painfully
damaging.
So, I hope to watch the “debates”
this evening, July 30. God damn it, this is important; are these the
last days? Get active, get ready, here
we are. Or, am I just now thinking “oh, the general welfare, maybe I should pay
attention and divert my energies from my own very specific local shit… “. I
know, it’s a challenge. But wow, the
consequences. No, nothing is
guaranteed. You could lose it all. Come on, we
are not immune. And the Japanese
and German people of the 30’s are not that different than us. Think about it.
Yes, Brother, it's all such a wonder. I don't know what it's all for, what it all means, but, being our Mother's daughter, I do have faith that it is not all without meaning and purpose. The question for me is, what is mine to do, in each and every moment. And then, to the best of my ability, look for and see the good. I'm just now reflecting on a few recent, endearing extensions of help from strangers, that brought tears to my eyes, remembering all the good that is here, everywhere (whether it is apparent or not). It makes me think of the first of Seven Core Assumptions authored by 2 restorative justice practitioners and leaders in the field, that they use as their personal North Star, "The True Self in Everyone is Good, Wise, & Powerful". And, so, I do believe that, and ... (by the way, the second Core Assumption is, "The World is Profoundly Interconnected")... Well, I've gone on enough now. Thank you for your blogging, you may have inspired me.
ReplyDeleteLove you!