Hey, it's short. I can read the whole thing! Happy Holidays.
![]() |
What I saw looking up after reading the first article (Hari Kunzru) Lake Pontchartrain and the Causeway |
Here’s the post: (reflections on reading a magazine)
When I heard about Kim
Stanley Robinson’s new novel, The Ministry For the Future, I felt certain that I
had to find a way to read it. The way-finding can be interesting, and that’s the
problem. Too interesting (the way-finding, that is). Earlier this week, I had my
folding bike with me when I dropped our behemoth car off at the Toyota dealer
for servicing. Carol and I had been pulling a trailer all across the country,
and so we needed a large vehicle, and these must be tended to. Unfolding the
bike, I looked out at a sunshiny day and just a few miles along the bike path on
the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain to Barnes and Noble, my source for
magazines.
That place was busy, seemed like non-pandemic times in there except
that people only had half a face showing. Wandering around the magazine racks, I
became convinced that some special information was waiting for me within the
pages of The Atlantic, Harper’s, and The Believer. After a while, my plan to
choose one of the three fell away and I bought them all. End-of-year splurge,
and all the better to very significantly delay my reading of an actual book,
such as Robinson’s new one. Of course, I have lots of podcasts to use as
delaying elements as well. In fact, one of those (The Ezra Klein Show) is how I
found out about the book, which Ezra claimed as his “most important book of the
year”. Robinson is a veteran Sci-Fi author who was born a month after me in
1952. He has written 20 books and this latest one is described as one of the
most powerful and original books on climate change ever written. His work has
been praised (coincidentally in The Atlantic) as "the gold-standard of
realistic, and highly literary, science-fiction writing." His writing tends to
include heroic scientists, a category of human that we’ve all been needing this year. I have finally obtained a copy of The Ministry For the Future, but
have yet to start reading it, except for the first sentence: “It was getting
hotter”.
Instead, I read the January 2021 issue of Harper’s cover to cover. I
want to be a reader of Rebecca Solnit books, but magazines and other distractions keep me
from completing actual books she has written. Happily for me, she was one of two
rotating writers for a monthly essay column in Harper’s called Easy Chair. Back
in the old times, when I would find myself in an airport several times a year, I
would relish my trips to the magazine stand. If Rebecca was the Harper's Easy Chair
writer for that month, I would always buy a copy. I love her take on things.
I once attended a talk by The Rebecca’s (Solnit and Snedecker), authors of
Unfathomable City, A New Orleans Atlas, published in 2013. The two authors have
essays that are presented along with maps with bizarre juxtapositions. Map 11 is
Hot and Steamy, Selling Seafood, Selling Sex. Here’s the map legend: Seafood
sites, Former seafood sites, Advocacy groups, Sex sites, Former sex sites,
Advocacy groups, Sex work zones, and Former sex work zones. I want to return to
this book, it’s really a great concept and works perfectly for this city (I
think Solnit was involved with ones for San Francisco and New York City as
well).
The January Harper’s features an essay by Hari Kunzru, who will be
rotating in the Easy Chair columnist position with Thomas Chatterton Williams.
It’s called Complexity, and deals with Kunzru’s take on the phenomenon of
widespread belief in QAnon, the conspiracy theory. It turns out that Kunzru has
been following these types of movements for years and has some interesting
things to say about this. He ultimately calls for some humility on the part of
humans. Apropos of conspiracy theorists interpreting everything in terms of a
knowable system of deception, he says: "We need to learn to step aside from our
unearned position as the measure of all things. And in another sense we will
need to learn to step back in, to relinquish our illusion of separateness from
the world, to give up our ironic distance and dive into the flow".
I next read
Harper’s Index, a page-long list of random metrics presented without comment:
“Portion of U.S, adults who consume news on YouTube: ¼”. And “Percentage of
YouTube channels that are oriented around a single person: 44”. An essay by KarlOve Knausgaard was next, which I went back to a second time and even now, I am
wondering what it was about (I think it’s our angle on things, individually and
sometimes Zeitgeisted-ly). But I did enjoy his pointing out that there is a
great contrast between Homer’s The Odyssey, which is “a book of transformations,
leaving an impression of an unfinished world”, and the Book of Leviticus which
is “solely concerned with laying down boundaries, establishing categories,
defining and identifying the relationship of culture to nature, telling us what
things belong together and what things absolutely do not”. At the end of the
piece, Knausgaard notes that “every one of us creates our own world and our own
identity, however obscurely, this being the task given to us at birth”. OK,
then!
A short piece from the August 2020 parole hearing for Mark David Chapman,
who murdered John Lennon 40 years ago on December 8. After the doorman at the
Dakota took his gun, Chapman opened the book he was holding, The Catcher in the
Rye, and started reading. I did not know that. I did not know the meaning of the
title of the book. What a crazy way, on the 40th anniversary of John’s death, to
learn about it, because Chapman’s parole commissioner read the passage back to
Chapman at the hearing. That’s just wild. Catcher Gone Awry.
“Pour Decisions”
relates how a restaurant decided to fess up to mixing up the wine order for 2
tables: one ordering a $2000 bottle of Rothschild, and the other the cheapest,
an $18 bottle of pinot noir. The restaurant owner, called by the manager at
home, decided to tell both parties the truth. Had he not done so, human
expectations and the power of suggestion would have taken care of it, no
complaints! Or maybe these were just simply poorly trained palates! Next was a
short story translated from the Danish, about the thoughts and perceptions of a
woman in the apparent last moments of her life.
And then a very long personal
story by the writer Ann Patchett, called These Precious Days. She relates events leading to
her 2017 meeting with a woman who turns out to eventually spend many days with
Ann and her husband Karl at their Nashville home. I like reading Ann Patchett’s
essays because she is very open and self-revealing about her very interesting
life. As I am a hack and very occasional writer, it’s of interest to me also
when she talks about how she does it. So far, Patchett’s novels (I think she has
7) are all on my “haven’t read” list, but in addition to this piece in the magazine,
I read her second non-fiction book, a collection of essays called This is the
Story of a Happy Marriage. Her Harper’s essay ends as follows: “Tell me how the
story ends. It doesn’t. It will. It hasn’t yet.”
The next piece is called
“Letter From Kyiv” and is about the Ukrainian extremist militias. I now have the
gloomy knowledge that things are much more dire in that country than I had
realized. But who knows, times change.
The Gate of Heaven is Everywhere; Among
the Contemplatives dealing with mysticism in modern Christianity, and features
the Franciscan priest Richard Rohr. The author of this piece, Fred Bahnson, says that “The Christian mystics sought an intense
experience of inwardness glaringly absent in American Christianity today.” I
would point out that Buddhism, at least the Zen and Insight traditions that
emphasize mindfulness and meditation, are becoming more popular in this country.
No doubt some seek to fill that glaring absence with meditative practice,
jumping ship from the religion of their youth altogether.
I think I have a short
attention span. I have an orientation toward starting, beginning, discovering,
newness. I think that’s it. I might be thinking too much, certainly I’ve been
told that as perhaps we all have: “don’t over-think it”. And yet, I really do
want to read books. That’s something you can do and can report on for credit.
It’s harder to get credit for reading magazines, although I have tried to plead
the case for credit here. If I were to say “I just read Hari Kunzru’s new novel,
The Red Pill”, that would be sufficient. I could go on to say “it’s title comes
from the Red Pill in the movie The Matrix, and that might be enough for you to
get a sense of it, along with my further comments such as “I loved it” or
whatever. I would automatically get credit for reading the book, and might be
the instigator of your reading it as well. But if, instead of the somewhat
lengthy reporting I’ve done here, I were to say “I just read the January 2021
issue of Harper’s”, there’s nothing brief to say that would convey it, and no
credit would be issued. And yet, value is certainly there.
These short
pieces can be riveting and damn good. As Ann Patchett points out, published
short stories are almost all good. She reasons that once a writer is into a long
novel, she’s going to press on and finish it come hell or high water, due to the
commitment she’s made. It might not have turned out as good as she thought, but
dammit, it’s getting published! Not so with short stories, the crappy ones just
get tossed and the writer starts all over. Seems to make sense, although with my
proclivities toward non-fiction and essays, my experience with stories is
limited. I had read every article in the magazine, but still the story (The
Souvenir Museum by Elizabeth McCracken) was unread. It’s about the journey of a woman and her 10 year
old son that involves Vikings, Legos, and steadying oneself with the ballast of
an old watch in your pocket. I wanted to skip reading it, but felt the need for completeness,
and I had Ms. Patchett’s theory about why I stood to gain. I’m not a literary
critic, but I know that discussing it with fellow readers (or learning that others hated it and quit after the first couple of paragraphs) would be much fun and would enrich my life. In fact, I encourage you to give it a go and let me know what you think!
As the editor Christopher Beha pointed out in his introduction to this issue,
“the magazine’s long-held affinity for fiction writers feels particularly
appropriate in this moment, not because we are owed a little break from reality,
but because there are moments when reality is best approached by way of the
imagination”. I am expecting good things in 2021. I hope you are too. Of course,
we’ll get a mix and there will be challenges and who knows, but we’ll take them
all together. If you are reading this, we undoubtedly will be experiencing
things in some fashion or another together in the coming year. Cheers, and all
the best. As one of my meditation teachers Jude Rozhon taught us to say when doing the
Buddhist practice of Lovingkindness:
May you be happy and peaceful.
May you be
healthy and strong.
May you be safe and free.
May you be curious and confident.
(I added that one)
Most excellent post. I enjoyed the experimental technique, the weaving of reflections on what's read with explanation and analysis of your reading and writing practices. It works and "sounds true." I haven't read "The Red Pill," but I watched the Matrix. Neo "Doubting Thomas" Anderson goes from being a 9-5 working drone in the matrix to becoming a savior of humankind... in the matrix! The red pill does not provide escape from the prison, just a change in scenery and some really cool fighting moves. Ha! Dodge the bullets and keep posting!
ReplyDeleteHappy to have another post from you, Rob! Let me know what you think of Ministry for the Future, I've had it on my list since I also heard the interview on the EK show. I did not enjoy his (seemingly universally beloved) Mars Trilogy because of the lifeless characters, but he's always had interesting ideas!
ReplyDelete